4.7 Article

Depletion of Mdig Changes Proteomic Profiling in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10082021

关键词

mdig; mass spectrometry; signaling pathways; breast cancer; biomarker

资金

  1. NIH [R01 ES028263, R01 ES028335, R01 ES031822]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study comprehensively analyzed the role of mdig in triple-negative breast cancer through proteomic analysis. The results revealed that mdig knockout significantly altered the expression of proteins and pathways associated with breast cancer, highlighting its importance in tumorigenicity and invasiveness.
Triple-negative breast cancers are highly aggressive with an overall poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. We had previously investigated the role of mdig, an oncogenic gene induced by some environmental risk factors, on the pathogenesis of breast cancer. However, a comprehensive analysis of the proteomic profile affected by mdig in triple-negative breast cancer has not been determined yet. Using label-free bottom-up quantitative proteomics, we compared wildtype control and mdig knockout MDA-MB-231 cells and identified the proteins and pathways that are significantly altered with mdig deletion. A total of 904 differentially expressed (p < 0.005) proteins were identified in the KO cells. Approximately 30 pathways and networks linked to the pathogenicity of breast cancer were either up- or downregulated, such as EIF2 signaling, the unfolded protein response, and isoleucine degradation I. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis established that the differentially expressed proteins have relevant biological actions in cell growth, motility, and malignancy. These data provide the first insight into protein expression patterns in breast cancer associated with a complete disruption of the mdig gene and yielded substantial information on the key proteins, biological processes, and pathways modulated by mdig that contribute to breast cancer tumorigenicity and invasiveness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据