4.7 Review

Prokineticin 2/PROK2 and Male Infertility

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102389

关键词

male infertility; PROK system; PROK2; pre-clinical and clinical study; azoospermia; biomarker

资金

  1. Sapienza University of Rome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Male infertility accounts for about 50% of infertility in couples, with the diagnosis and treatment process being crucial in understanding the biological origins of infertility and potential therapeutic interventions. The prokineticin system, particularly PROK2, plays a significant role in male infertility by offering new insights into testicular pathophysiology and potential therapeutic hypotheses.
Male infertility represents about 50% of the causes of infertility in couples. The diagnosis process represents an important procedure for defining, when possible, the causes and approaching treatments (pharmacological, surgical) aimed at overcoming the problem. Several scientific studies have set out to discover early and indicative markers capable of providing information on the biological origin of infertility and increase current knowledge in the context of new potential therapeutic approaches. The prokineticin system (PROK) consists of the prokineticin 1 (PROK1) and prokineticin 2 (PROK2) proteins. Through the activation of two G-protein receptors (PROKR1 and PROKR2) regulate a wide range of biological functions, including gastrointestinal motility, circadian rhythm regulation, neurogenesis, angiogenesis, pain perception, and mood regulation. Several studies have highlighted the crucial role of the PROK system in the development and maturation of both male and female human reproductive organs. Particularly in men, the PROK system represents a new system useful to clarify some aspects of testicular pathophysiology and provide new potential hypotheses for therapeutic intervention. This narrative review aims to illustrate the state of the art regarding, in particular, the role of PROK2 in male infertility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据