4.8 Article

Interface engineering with zincophilic MXene for regulated deposition of dendrite-free Zn metal anode

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 243-251

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.05.022

关键词

Zinc-ion batteries; Interface protective layer; Molecular engineering; Anode; Self-assembly

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51972064]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a tetramethylammonium-intercalated Ti3C2Tx MXene (MX-TMA) coating was constructed on the surface of zinc foil, improving the stability of zinc anodes. The experiment showed that MX-TMA can prolong the lifespan of zinc electrodes and achieve stable cycles even under deep discharge.
Dendrite growth and side reactions on zinc anodes have been the main problems hindering the commercialization of aqueous zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs). The construction of an interface protective layer (IPL) has proved to be one of the effective ways to improve the stability of zinc anodes, but it remains a challenge to achieve multi functionality. Herein, tetramethylammonium-intercalated Ti3C2Tx MXene (MX-TMA) coating with a low zinc nucleation barrier was in-situ constructed on the surface of zinc foil by a facile self-assembly method. It provides the IPL with abundant zincophilic sites and better hydrophilicity, which promotes the transport of Zn2+ for uniform electrodeposition and inhibits interface side reactions. Moreover, the directional deposition of zinc on the beneficial (002) plane guided by MX-TMA is further revealed. As a result, the lifespan of the zinc electrode under 2 mA cm(-2) is prolonged by 3600 h. Even under deep discharge (DODZn asymptotic to 85%), the MX-TMA@Zn anode can still achieve stable cycles for more than 450 h. Furthermore, the full battery assembled with the Mn-based cathode also demonstrated superior performance. This work provides an in-depth mechanism analysis and inspiration for IPL design, thus advancing the development and practical application of ZIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据