4.8 Article

Empirically grounded technology forecasts and the energy transition

期刊

JOULE
卷 6, 期 9, 页码 2057-2082

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.08.009

关键词

-

资金

  1. Partners for a New Economy
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [730427]
  3. Oxford Martin School, through the Institute of New Economic Thinking
  4. Baillie Gifford
  5. Post -Carbon Transition programme [LDR00530]
  6. Economics of Energy Innovation and System Transition project (EEIST)
  7. UK Aid by the UK Government Department for Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy (BEIS)
  8. Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rapidly decarbonizing the global energy system is crucial for addressing climate change. This study presents probabilistic cost forecasts for solar energy, wind energy, batteries, and electrolyzers, which indicate that a swift transition to green energy can result in substantial savings.
Rapidly decarbonizing the global energy system is critical for address-ing climate change, but concerns about costs have been a barrier to im-plementation. Most energy-economy models have historically underes-timated deployment rates for renewable energy technologies and overestimated their costs. These issues have driven calls for alternative approaches and more reliable technology forecasting methods. Here, we use an approach based on probabilistic cost forecasting methods that have been statistically validated by backtesting on more than 50 technologies. We generate probabilistic cost forecasts for solar energy, wind energy, batteries, and electrolyzers, conditional on deployment. We use these methods to estimate future energy system costs and explore how technology cost uncertainty propagates through to sys-tem costs in three different scenarios. Compared to continuing with a fossil fuel-based system, a rapid green energy transition will likely result in overall net savings of many trillions of dollars-even without account-ing for climate damages or co-benefits of climate policy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据