4.4 Article

Giving and stealing ideas in memory: Source errors in recall are influenced by both early-selection and late-correction retrieval processes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 87-103

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.01.004

关键词

Unconscious plagiarism; Source memory; Generation; Monitoring; Recall

资金

  1. Economic and Social Research Council of UK [RES-062-23-2766]
  2. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/I003177/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. ESRC [ES/I003177/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies of unconscious plagiarism have asked participants to recall their own ideas from a previous group-problem solving session, and have typically reported that people mistakenly include a partner's responses when trying to recall their own. To date, there has been little research looking at the propensity to include one's own responses when trying to recall a partner's previous contribution to the group. Experiment I demonstrated that people make both kinds of source-error during recall, but source errors are more common in the recall-partner task. This pattern was replicated in Experiments 2a and 2b with source-errors and intrusions increasing over a delay. Experiment 3 used an extended version of each recall task, in which participants reported all items that came to mind, whilst indicating which responses were goal-relevant. The tendency for source-errors to occur more for the recall-partner task was shown to be a function of both idea availability and output monitoring, whereas the tendency for source-errors to increase over a delay was shown to be due solely to output monitoring. Thus, unconscious plagiarism errors are one instantiation of the more general problem of source-specified recall, which is influenced jointly by processes at generation and output monitoring. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据