4.7 Article

Solvent recycle with imperfect membranes: A semi-continuous workaround for diafiltration

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 514, 期 -, 页码 646-658

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.056

关键词

Solvent recovery; Membrane cascade; Organic solvent nanofiltration; Solvent consumption; Sustainability

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/K502856/1]
  2. School of Chemical Engineering & Analytical Science, The University of Manchester
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1369567] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For separation of a two-component mixture, a three-stage organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) process is presented which comprises of a two-stage membrane cascade for separation with a third membrane stage added for integrated solvent recovery, i.e. solvent recycling. The two-stage cascade allows for increased separation selectivity whilst the integrated solvent recovery stage mitigates the otherwise large solvent consumption of the purification. This work explores the effect of washing the solvent recovery unit at intervals in order to attain high product purities with imperfect solvent recovery membranes possessing less than 100% rejection of the impurity. This operation attains a purity of 98.7% through semi-continuous operation with two washes of the solvent recovery stage, even when imperfect membranes are used in a closed-loop set-up. This contrasts favourably with the 83.0% maximum purity achievable in a similar set-up with a single continuous run. The process achieves slightly lower (-0.7%) yield of around 98.2% compared to a continuously operated process without solvent recovery but consumes approx. 85% less solvent (theoretical analysis suggests up to 96% reduction is possible). 9 different membranes, both commercial (GMT, Novamem, SolSep) and in-house fabricated, are screened and tested on a separation challenge associated with the synthesis of macrocycles - amongst the membrane materials are polyimide (PI), polybenzimidazole (PBI) and, polyetheretherketone (PEEK). (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据