4.6 Article

Long-term deflection monitoring of a box girder bridge with an optical-fiber, liquid-level system

期刊

STRUCTURES
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 904-919

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.048

关键词

Deflection; Fiber Bragg grating (FBG) -differential settlement measurement (DSM) sensor; Liquid -level system; Long-term monitoring; Optical fiber; Prestressed concrete (PC) box girder; Repaired earthquake -damaged bridge

资金

  1. NCREE
  2. Ministry Of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan
  3. Recruitment of Visiting Science and Technology Personnel [MOST 110-2811-E-492-500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a fiber Bragg grating (FBG)-differential settlement measurement (DSM) system was used to monitor the vertical displacement of a prestressed concrete box girder bridge for 2 years. The system showed potential for inexpensive and long-term monitoring of bridges without requiring suitable environmental conditions and intensive labor work.
In this study, a fiber Bragg grating (FBG)-differential settlement measurement (DSM) system was used to conduct 2-year monitoring of the vertical displacement of a prestressed concrete box girder bridge that had previously been damaged in an earthquake. This system is based on the principles of the hydrostatic liquid leveling of connected vessels, buoyancy, the equilibrium of forces, and the photoelasticity of FBGs. Specifically, a series of vertical displacements were measured at 42 observation points along the aforementioned bridge and used to determine its load-carrying capacity. Static vehicle loading tests were also conducted, and the displacement measurements of the FBG-DSM system were compared with those of conventional sensors and the displacement values simulated through finite-element simulation. The results reveal that the FBG-DSM liquid-level system has high potential for the inexpensive, long-term monitoring of bridges over long distances without requiring suit-able environmental conditions, in situ visibility and intensive labor work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据