4.7 Article

Effect of the Torsion Box Dimensions on Local Stress Distribution and Fatigue Strength Assessment of a Container Ship

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse10091172

关键词

torsion box; container ship; fatigue; hull girder strength; shear stress

资金

  1. Universidad Politecnica de Madrid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper estimates the influence of torsion box dimensions on local stress distribution and fatigue strength in a 2400TEU feeder-class container ship using a numerical approach. The study compares different structural details through geometrical modifications and assesses the structural influence on stress distribution. Scantling criteria are obtained to improve the design of this important region in container ships.
The aim of this paper is to estimate the influence of the dimensions of the torsion box (height and width), of a 2400TEU feeder-class container ship, on local stress distribution and assessment of local fatigue strength by using a numerical approach based on the fatigue limit-state and ultimate limit-state in the midship region. In terms of the fatigue limit-state, the effect of the dimensions of the torsion box is obtained by geometrical modifications, in the connection between the side shell longitudinal stiffeners with the transverse web frame for nine structural details, referring to different arrangements of strengthening elements (brackets and flat bars). The process of comparing the different elements determines the most effective combination. This structural influence on the local stress distribution is assessed, along the longitudinal plates between ordinary stiffeners bounding the perimeter of the torsion box, by calculating the hull girder stresses, local buckling stresses and shear stress distribution induced by vertical and horizontal shear forces, Saint Venant and warping torques, and finally the shear stresses induced by a warping moment. Scantling criteria are obtained allowing for a better design of this very important region in container ships.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据