4.7 Article

Influence of hydrophobization conditions and ceramic membranes pore size on their properties in vacuum membrane distillation of water-organic solvent mixtures

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 499, 期 -, 页码 442-451

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.067

关键词

Hydrophobization; Ceramic membranes; Vacuum membrane distillation; Transport mechanism

资金

  1. French Embassy in Warsaw
  2. Institut Europeen des Membranes de Montpellier (France)
  3. CNRS
  4. Polish National Science Centre [2012/07/N/5T4/00378]
  5. Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland [T-109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The initially hydrophilic micro-and macroporous ceramic membranes were successfully hydrophobized by grafting with fluoroalkylsilane (FAS) molecules. The influence of diverse parameters (e.g. type of molecule, duration of grafting, concentration of FAS solution, type of solvent) on the resulting hydrophobic surface was investigated. The liquid entry pressure of water (LEPw) was used as a measure of the hydrophobization efficiency. The prepared membranes were subsequently investigated in vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) process using pure water and water-organic solvent solutions as feed mixtures. It was found that permeate flux of pure water is strictly correlated with LEPw value. The selectivity of membranes in contact with water-organic mixtures depends strongly on the pore size of the hydrophobized membrane. Microporous membrane are much less efficient in the separation of organics from water (separation factor of ethyl acetate - EtAc in the range 1.3-30) comparing with macroporous ones (separation factor of EtAc in the range 32-60). The results were also discussed assuming the various mechanism of transports through porous ceramic membranes. These latter results were additionally compared with the results obtained for hydrophobic polymeric membranes (separation factor of EtAc in the range 25-450). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据