4.7 Article

Towards stable operation of a dynamic membrane bioreactor (DMBR): Operational process, behavior and retention effect of dynamic membrane

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 498, 期 -, 页码 20-29

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.009

关键词

Dynamic membrane bioreactor; Wastewater treatment; Nylon mesh; Operational process; Retention effect

资金

  1. National Program of Water Pollution Control in China [2013ZX07310-001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51508450]
  3. Fund for Postdoctoral Scientific Research Project of China [2015M572531]
  4. Program for Innovative Research Team in Shaanxi [IRT2013KCT-13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An experimental study was conducted for characterizing the whole operational cycle of a dynamic membrane bioreactor (DMBR). With a nylon mesh of 25 pm pore size as support material, the filtration flux was suddenly halved within 5 min, indicating a rapid cake layer formation. Then the flux declined gradually and became stable at t=4 h, indicating the maturation of the dynamic membrane (DM) for stable operation. By periodical bottom aeration, the flux kept stable until t=24 h before physical cleaning should be conducted for DM regeneration. In such an operational cycle, effluent turbidity about 3 NTU was only detected at the start, dropped to about 0.5 NTU after 5 min and kept lower afterwards. Effective and stable removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammonia, phosphorus was achieved in the 2-month continuous operation period. Although air backwashing brought about effective recovery of the flux, additional surface brushing could further remove the irremovable fouling. By morphological and physicochemical analysis, it was identified that the DM could retain 15.3% of COD and 10.6% of polysaccharides from the activated sludge, as well as certain amount of protein-like and humic-like substances. These membrane fouling substances should be removed by physical cleaning for DM regeneration. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据