4.7 Article

Characterisation of canine CD34+/CD45 diminished cells by colony-forming unit assay and transcriptome analysis

期刊

FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.936623

关键词

surface antigen; stem cell; dog; CD34; bone marrow

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study characterizes the haematopoietic ability and gene expression profiles of canine bone marrow HSPCs in healthy dogs. The CD34+/CD45(dim) cells exhibited higher haematopoietic colony formation ability and gene expression profiles similar to human and mouse HSPCs. The findings suggest that these cells could be used for studying haematopoietic stem cells in dogs.
Haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) are used for transplantation to reconstruct the haematopoietic pathways in humans receiving severe chemotherapy. However, the characteristics of canine HSPCs, such as specific surface antigens and gene expression profiles, are still unclear. This study aimed to characterise the haematopoietic ability and gene expression profiles of canine bone marrow HSPCs in healthy dogs. In this study, the CD34 positive (CD34+) cells were defined as classical HSPCs, CD34+/CD45 diminished (CD45(dim)) cells as more enriched HSPCs, and whole viable cells as controls. Haematopoietic abilities and gene expression profiles were evaluated using a colony-forming unit assay and RNA-sequencing analysis. Canine CD34+/CD45(dim) cells exhibited a significantly higher haematopoietic colony formation ability and expressed more similarity in the gene expression profiles to human and mouse HSPCs than those of the other cell fractions. Furthermore, the canine CD34+/CD45(dim) cells expressed candidate cell surface antigens necessary to define the canine haematopoietic hierarchy roadmap. These results indicate that the canine CD34+/CD45(dim) cells express the HSPC characteristics more than the other cell fractions, thereby suggesting that these cells have the potential to be used for studying haematopoietic stem cells in dogs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据