4.7 Article

Dynamics of water and solute transport in polymeric reverse osmosis membranes via molecular dynamics simulations

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 506, 期 -, 页码 95-108

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.051

关键词

-

资金

  1. Northwestern University High Performance Computing Center
  2. National Science Foundation [ACI-1053575]
  3. Institute for Sustainability and Energy at Northwestern (ISEN)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Angstrom-scale transport characteristics of water and six different solutes, methanol, ethanol, 2-propanol, urea, Na+, and Cl-, were studied for a polyamide reverse osmosis (RO) membrane, FT-30, using non-equilibrium molecular dynamics (NEMD) simulations. Results indicate that water transport increases with an increasing fraction of connected percolated free volume, or water-accessible open space, in the membrane polymer structure. This free volume is enhanced by the dynamic structure of the membrane at the molecular level as it swells when hydrated and vibrates due to molecular collisions allowing a continuous path connecting the opposite membrane surfaces. The tortuous paths available for transport of solutes result in Brownian motion of solute molecules and hopping from pore to pore as they pass through the polymer network structure of the membrane. The transport of alcohol solutes decreases for solutes with larger Van der Waals volume, which corresponds to less available percolated free volume, or solute-accessible space, within the membrane polymer structure. However, the Van der Waals size of the dehydrated solutes is generally not a good measure to predict solute transport or rejection. Urea has reduced transport compared to ethanol, most likely due to more complex chemistry, even though urea has a smaller Van der Waals volume than ethanol. Na+ and Cl- experience the lowest transport, likely due to strong ion-water and ion-ion electrostatic interactions. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据