4.4 Article

Improved Soliton Solutions of Generalized Fifth Order Time-Fractional KdV Models: Laplace Transform with Homotopy Perturbation Algorithm

期刊

UNIVERSE
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/universe8110563

关键词

fractional partial differential equations; Korteweg-de Vries equations; time-fractional Sawada-Kotera equation; time-fractional Ito equation; time-fractional Lax's equation; time-fractional Kaup-Kupershmidt equation; Laplace transform; homotopy perturbation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research proposes a new methodology to observe a class of time-fractional generalized fifth-order Korteweg-de Vries equations and applies it to several related models. The method provides improved and convergent series solutions through symbolic computation. The results show that this method outperforms other fractional KdV schemes in terms of accuracy and computational complexity.
The main purpose of this research is to propose a new methodology to observe a class of time-fractional generalized fifth-order Korteweg-de Vries equations. Laplace transform along with a homotopy perturbation algorithm is utilized for the solution and analysis purpose in the current study. This extended technique provides improved and convergent series solutions through symbolic computation. The proposed methodology is applied to time-fractional Sawada-Kotera, Ito, Lax's, and Kaup-Kupershmidt models, which are induced from a generalized fifth-order KdV equation. For validity purposes, obtained and existing results at integral orders are compared. Convergence analysis was also performed by computing solutions and errors at different values in a fractional domain. Dynamic behavior of the fractional parameter is also studied graphically. Simulations affirm the dominance of the proposed algorithm in terms of accuracy and fewer computations as compared to other available schemes for fractional KdVs. Hence, the projected algorithm can be utilized for more advanced fractional models in physics and engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据