4.6 Article

Computed Tomography-Guided Localization and Extended Segmentectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092043

关键词

Lung cancer; VATS; thoracoscopy; Segmentectomy; CT-guided percutaneous needle localization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of CT-guided localization followed by extended segmentectomy for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. The results showed that this treatment method can preserve lung volume and achieve good therapeutic effects and safety.
Background: Lung cancer is one of the most devastating cancers. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) can detect lung cancer at an early stage of the disease when a minimally invasive surgical procedure using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is the best strategy. Herein, we discuss the treatment of deep lung tumors between segments or lesions located near the margin of a segment. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted from January 2013 to January 2020 using the National Taiwan University Hospital data bank. We included early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent lung surgery and screened out those who received CT-guided localization for extended segmentectomy. Outcome measurements were safety margin, complication rate, and postoperative course. Results: During the study period, 68 patients with early-stage NSCLC received CT-guided localization followed by extended segmentectomy. The mean surgery time was 92.1 +/- 30.3 min, and the mean blood loss was 32.8 mL. Mean drainage time was 2.3 +/- 1 days, and the total hospital stay was 4.9 +/- 1.1 days. Pathological reports showed tumor-free resection margins >2 cm. Sixty-one patients had adenocarcinoma at stage IA and two patients at stage IB. One patient had squamous cell carcinoma at stage IA. Conclusion: CT-guided localization followed by extended segmentectomy allows lung volume preservation with clean safety margins and good clinical outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据