4.6 Article

Annona squamosa L. Extract-Loaded Niosome and Its Anti-Ehrlich Ascites' Carcinoma Activity

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 7, 期 43, 页码 38436-38447

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03649

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on the anticancer properties of Annona squamosa leaves extract and its extract-loaded noisome. The results showed that A. squamosa leaves extract exhibited significant anticancer activity, and the loaded extract showed even more promising results. Treated groups showed reduced tumor volume, improved liver and kidney functions, decreased inflammatory markers, and improved oxidative stress.
Current research is focused on cancer treatments other than chemotherapy medications, particularly those derived from natural sources. The goal of this work was to look at the anticancer and biomarker properties of a methanolic extract of Annona squamosa leaves and their extract-loaded noisome. A. squamosa leaves extract and their leaves extract-loaded noisome were prepared. Transmission electron microscopy was used to screen the size of the niosomes loaded with the A. squamosa L. leaves extract. The tumor size, blood picture (hemoglobin, red blood cells, white blood cells), liver functions, kidney function, oxidative stress, and inflammatory markers were evaluated to assess the potential anticancer activity of the A. squamosa leaves extract and A. squamosa leaves extract-loaded noisome in Ehrlich ascites carcinoma. A. squamosa L. leaves extract was found to be an effective anticancer treatment. The protective effect of the loaded extract showed more significant results. All treated groups showed a lower tumor volume compared to the positive control. Liver and kidney functions were improved, and inflammatory markers were decreased. Oxidative stress was improved in tumor, liver, and kidney tissues. A. squamosa leaves contain major anticancer compounds that in general help most enzymes of the liver and kidney and other injured organs to return to their normal levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据