4.6 Article

Synthesis of B/Si Bidentate Lewis Acids, o-(Fluorosilyl)borylbenzenes and o-(Difluorosilyl)borylbenzenes, and Their Fluoride Ion Affinities

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 7, 期 35, 页码 30939-30953

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c02775

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [25105740, 15H00961]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, detailed studies on a series of o-(silyl)(boryl)benzenes were reported. These compounds can capture fluoride ions and exhibit mu-fluoro-bridging properties. Experimental and theoretical methods were used to reveal the nature of the silicon-fluorine and boron-fluorine bonding interactions in these compounds.
Herein, we report detailed studies on a series of o-(silyl)(boryl)benzenes (1-4), in which the two Lewis acid centers consisting of silicon and boron atoms are linked via an o-phenylene skeleton. o-(Fluorosilyl)(dimesitylboryl)benzenes 1 and 2 were prepared by the reaction of fluorodimesitylborane with [o -(fluor odimethylsilyl)phenyl]lithium (7) and [o-(fluorodiphenylsilyl)phenyl]lithium (8), respectively. o-(Difluorosilyl)(dimesitylboryl)benzenes 3 and 4 were also prepared by the reaction of fluorodimesitylborane with o-{[di(methoxy)methylsilyl]phenyl}lithium (11) and o-{[di(methoxy)phenylsilyl]-phenyl}lithium (12), respectively, and their subsequent treatment with HF center dot pyridine. Compounds 1-4 readily capture a fluoride ion in the presence of 18-crown-6 or [2.2.2]cryptand to afford their corresponding mu-fluoro-bridged ate complexes (15-18). The structures of 15-18 were revealed by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. DFT studies and natural bond orbital analysis of 15-18 were conducted to elucidate the nature of the Si-F and B-F bonding interactions in the mu-fluoro-bridges. The fluoride ion affinities of 1-4 were investigated by( 1)H NMR spectroscopy to monitor their competitive reactions. The dynamic behaviors of 15-18 at variable temperatures were monitored using F-19 NMR spectroscopy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据