4.6 Article

Electrochemical Immunosensor for Detection of H. pylori Secretory Protein VacA on g-C3N4/ZnO Nanocomposite-Modified Au Electrode

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03627

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Science & Technology (DST) , India [TDP/BDTD/33/2019]
  2. Science and Engineering Research Board (DST-SERB, Government of India) [SB/DF/011/2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An electrochemical biosensor was designed for detecting a specific toxin of Helicobacter pylori, utilizing a nanocomposite-modified gold electrode and VacA antibodies for detection. The sensor showed good stability, sensitivity, and selectivity.
A g-C3N4/ZnO (graphitic carbon nitride/zinc oxide) nanocomposite-decorated gold electrode was employed to design an antigen-antibody-based electrochemical biosensor to detect Helicobacter pylori specific toxin, vacuolating cytotoxin A (VacA). The thermal condensation method was used to synthesize the g-C3N4/ZnO nanocomposite, and the nanocomposite was deposited electrochemically on a gold electrode. The morphology as well as the structure of the synthesized nanocomposite were confirmed by scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, X-ray diffraction, and Fourier transform infrared techniques. The nanocomposite efficiently increased the sensor performance by amplifying the signals. EDC-NHS chemistry was exploited for attachment of VacA antibodies covalently with the g-C3N4/ZnO-modified gold electrode. This modified electrode was exploited for immunosensing of H. pylori-specific VacA antigen. The immunosensor was stable for up to 30 days and exhibited good sensitivity of 0.3 mu A(-1) ng mL(-1) in a linear detection range of 0.1 to 12.8 ng mL(-1). Apart from this, the fabricated sensor showed unprecedented reproducibility and remarkable selectivity toward the H. pylori toxin VacA. Thus, the highly sensitive immunosensor is a desirable platform for H. pylori detection in practical applications and clinical diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据