4.7 Article

Qualitative and Quantitative Anatomical Analysis of the Constitutive Bark of Q. ilex x Q. suber Hybrids

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 11, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants11192475

关键词

cork; hybridization; Quercus; rhytidome; suberization

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [AGL2015-67495-C2-2-R]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [PID2019-110330GB-C22]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides a qualitative and quantitative description of the bark of hybrids between cork oak and holm oak. The hybrids show characteristics intermediate between the parent species and also exhibit unique features, suggesting significant modifications in the genetic expression patterns. These findings highlight the value of hybrid individuals in understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying bark development in angiosperms.
Hybridization and introgression between cork oak (Quercus suber) and holm oak (Q. ilex) have traditionally been reckoned as undesirable processes, since hybrid individuals lack the profitable bark characteristics of cork oak. Nevertheless, a systematic and quantitative description of the bark of these hybrids at the microscopic level, based on a significant number of individuals, is not available to date. In this work we provide such a qualitative and quantitative description, identifying the most relevant variables for their classification. Hybrids show certain features intermediate between those of the parent species (such as phellem percentage in the outer bark, which was approximately 40% as a mean value for hybrids, 20% in holm oak and almost 99% in cork oak), as well as other unique features, such as the general suberization of inactive phloem (up to 25% in certain individuals), reported here for the first time. These results suggest a relevant hybridization-induced modification of the genetic expression patterns. Therefore, hybrid individuals provide a valuable material to disentangle the molecular mechanisms underpinning bark development in angiosperms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据