4.7 Article

Temporal evolution of the selectivity-permeability relationship during porous membrane filtration of protein solutions

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 514, 期 -, 页码 385-397

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.022

关键词

Microfiltration; Ultrafiltration; Selectivity-permeability relationship; Pore structure; Physicochemical interactions

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21447004]
  2. Special Fund for State Joint Key Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control of China [2070403GK]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, there is no clear understanding on the effects of membrane properties on temporal evolution of membrane selectivity-permeability relationships during microfiltration or ultrafiltration-based water treatment. In this study, porous polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane, polyvinyl chloride membrane, and glass-fiber membrane with distinctive physical and chemical properties were employed to filter bovine serum albumin (BSA) at different pH, coupled with model simulation approaches. Both the experimental results and model prediction showed that, due to the existence of different filtration mechanisms, selectivity of the PVDF membrane and the PVC membrane increase with decreasing permeability, whereas an opposite trend was observed for the glass-fiber membrane. Also, pH strongly affected permeability by changing the zeta potentials of the solutes and the membrane surfaces. Moreover, membrane selectivity was less significantly affected by pH for the polymeric membranes than for the glass-fiber membrane. Practically, high selectivity and permeability may be simultaneously achieved during water treatment by: (1) selection of membranes with suitable pore structure (such as control of solute diameter > 1/5 pore diameter); (2) control of feed water condition (such as pH) to suppress intermolecular interactions or solute-membrane interactions, further influence the deposition/adsorption of solute on membrane. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据