4.7 Article

Exogenous Spermidine Promotes Germination of Aged Sorghum Seeds by Mediating Sugar Metabolism

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 11, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants11212853

关键词

aged sorghum seeds; germination; spermidine; starch; sugar metabolism

资金

  1. China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA [CARS-06-14.5-A17]
  2. General Research Project of Education Department of Liaoning Province of China [LSNFW202006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exogenous spermidine promotes germination in aged sorghum seeds by regulating starch and sugar metabolism, improving the germination ability of seeds.
Starch, a substance stored in seeds, is the main source of energy for germination in sorghum seeds. However, as the seeds age, the catabolism of seed starch is affected, thereby seriously damaging germination ability. In this study, we aimed to understand how exogenous spermidine promoted germination in aged sorghum seed. Our phenotypic analysis indicated that exogenous spermidine not only significantly improved the germination rate, germination potential, germination index, and vigor index of aged seeds, but also increased the root and shoot length after germination. Further, physiological analysis showed that exogenous spermidine increased the content of soluble sugar by upregulating the activity of amylase and sucrose invertase. Exogenous spermidine also improved the activities of key enzymes in glycolysis, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and the pentose phosphate pathway of aged sorghum seeds. Interestingly, exogenous spermidine protected the mitochondrial structure of aged seeds, which was consistent with the increase in the respiration rate and ATP content during seed germination. Moreover, qRT-PCR analysis revealed that exogenous spermidine induced the expression of key genes related to starch and sugar metabolism in aged sorghum seeds. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that exogenous spermidine promoted aged sorghum seed germination by regulating starch and sugar metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据