4.7 Article

Descriptive Genomic Analysis and Sequence Genotyping of the Two Papaya Species (Vasconcellea pubescens and Vasconcellea chilensis) Using GBS Tools

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 11, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants11162151

关键词

Vasconcellea; SNPs/INDELs; GBS

资金

  1. Fondecyt [1150919]
  2. Programa de Fortalecimiento de Centros Regionales [R19A10001]
  3. Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo de Chile (ANID), Chile

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A genotyping by sequencing (GBS) approach was used to analyze the genetic diversity in V. pubescens and V. chilensis. The cultivated V. pubescens exhibited low genetic diversity and differentiation, while V. chilensis showed high genetic diversity. Critical SNPs/INDELs associated with stress responses and development were identified. These results will be beneficial for future breeding and conservation programs.
A genotyping by sequencing (GBS) approach was used to analyze the organization of genetic diversity in V. pubescens and V. chilensis. GBS identified 4675 and 4451 SNPs/INDELs in two papaya species. The cultivated orchards of V. pubescens exhibited scarce genetic diversity and low but significant genetic differentiation. The neutrality test yielded a negative and significant result, suggesting that V. pubescens suffered a selective sweep or a rapid expansion after a bottleneck during domestication. In contrast, V. chilensis exhibited a high level of genetic diversity. The genetic differentiation among the populations was slight, but it was possible to distinguish the two genetic groups. The neutrality test indicated no evidence that natural selection and genetic drift affect the natural population of V. chilensis. Using the Carica papaya genome as a reference, we identified critical SNPs/INDELs associated with putative genes. Most of the identified genes are related to stress responses (salt and nematode) and vegetative and reproductive development. These results will be helpful for future breeding and conservation programs of the Caricaceae family.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据