4.5 Review

Rare Etiologies in Immune-Mediated Cerebellar Ataxias: Diagnostic Challenges

期刊

BRAIN SCIENCES
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12091165

关键词

cerebellum; immune-mediated cerebellar ataxias; autoimmune ataxia; primary autoimmune cerebellar ataxia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cerebellum is vulnerable to immune attacks and can be affected by various immune-mediated cerebellar ataxias (IMCAs). These conditions have diverse etiologies, presenting with different clinical features, with cerebellar ataxia being a main phenotype. Further research and diagnosis are needed to better understand primary autoimmune cerebellar ataxia (PACA).
The cerebellum is particularly enriched in antigens and represents a vulnerable target to immune attacks. Immune-mediated cerebellar ataxias (IMCAs) have diverse etiologies, such as gluten ataxia (GA), post-infectious cerebellitis (PIC), Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS), paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD), opsoclonus myoclonus syndrome (OMS), and anti-GAD ataxia. Apart from these well-established entities, cerebellar ataxia (CA) occurs also in association with autoimmunity against ion channels and related proteins, synaptic adhesion/organizing proteins, transmitter receptors, glial cells, as well as the brainstem antigens. Most of these conditions manifest diverse neurological clinical features, with CAs being one of the main clinical phenotypes. The term primary autoimmune cerebellar ataxia (PACA) refers to ataxic conditions suspected to be autoimmune even in the absence of specific well-characterized pathogenic antibody markers. We review advances in the field of IMCAs and propose a clinical approach for the understanding and diagnosis of IMCAs, focusing on rare etiologies which are likely underdiagnosed. The frontiers of PACA are discussed. The identification of rare immune ataxias is of importance since they are potentially treatable and may lead to a severe clinical syndrome in absence of early therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据