4.6 Review

A Literature Overview of Secondary Peritonitis Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients

期刊

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11101347

关键词

beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors; carbapenemase; combination therapy; critically ill patients; intra-abdominal infections; Enterobacterales; postoperative peritonitis; precision medicine; secondary peritonitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This comprehensive review focuses on the healthcare problem of secondary peritonitis caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens, specifically carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). The paper highlights the importance of antimicrobial stewardship and precision medicine in combating antimicrobial resistance. It also emphasizes the need for cautious use of new drugs effective against CRE in empirical therapy for secondary peritonitis.
This comprehensive review of the recently published literature offers an overview of a very topical and complex healthcare problem: secondary peritonitis from multidrug-resistant pathogens, especially carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). Spontaneous secondary peritonitis and postsurgical secondary peritonitis are among the major causes of community- and healthcare-acquired sepsis, respectively. A large number of patients enter ICUs with a diagnosis of secondary peritonitis, and a high number of them reveal infection by CRE, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii. For this reason, we conceived the idea to create a synthetic report on this topic including updated epidemiology data, a description of CRE resistance patterns, current strategies of antimicrobial treatment, and future perspectives. From this update it is clear that antimicrobial stewardship and precision medicine are becoming essential to fight the emergence of antimicrobial resistance and that even if there are new drugs effective against CRE causing secondary peritonitis, these drugs have to be used carefully especially in empirical therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据