4.7 Article

Aromatic, Sensory, and Fatty Acid Profiles of Arbequina Extra Virgin Olive Oils Produced Using Different Malaxation Conditions

期刊

FOODS
卷 11, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11213446

关键词

organoleptic; fruity; bitter; hexanal; oleic acid; multivariate analysis

资金

  1. Ministry of Science Innovation and Universities [FPU2018/03119, BES-2017-080017, RYC-2016-19355]
  2. CERCA Program of the Generalitat of Catalonia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that Arbequina olive oils produced under different malaxation parameters were classified as EVOO, but cold extraction at 20 degrees Celsius may result in more positive sensory attributes. The concentration of fatty acids increased significantly with malaxation temperature, while the percentage profile remained unchanged.
The demand for high-quality extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) is growing due to its unique characteristics. The aroma and flavor of EVOO depend on its content of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), whose formation is affected by the olive variety and maturity index, and the oil production process. In this study, the sensory quality and VOC and fatty acid (FA) profiles were determined in Arbequina olive oils produced by applying different malaxation parameters (20, 25, and 30 degrees C, and 30 and 45 min). All the olive oils were classified as EVOO by a sensory panel, regardless of the production conditions. However, cold extraction at 20 degrees C resulted in more positive sensory attributes (complexity). The FA concentration increased significantly with the malaxation temperature, although the percentage profile remained unaltered. Finally, an OPLS-DA model was generated to identify the discriminating variables that separated the samples according to the malaxation temperature. In conclusion, the tested range of malaxation parameters appeared not to degrade the distinctive attributes/organoleptic profile of olive oil and could be applied to obtain an EVOO of high sensory quality, especially at 20 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据