4.7 Article

Evidence from a Choice Experiment in Consumer Preference towards Infant Milk Formula (IMF) in the Context of Dairy Revitalization and COVID-19 Pandemic

期刊

FOODS
卷 11, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11172689

关键词

China; infant milk formula; consumer preference; choice experiment

资金

  1. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China, raw milk quality and safety supervision project [A170202]
  2. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (ASTIP) of CAAS [CAAS-ASTIP2016-AII]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

China, as the largest consumer of IMF, has seen a shift in Chinese parents' preferences towards IMF after the COVID-19 outbreak, prioritizing quality and safety attributes and showing increased confidence in domestically produced IMF.
China is the largest global consumer of infant milk formula (IMF). Chinese consumer preferences towards IMF have evolved over time but have also been rocked in recent years by COVID-19 with major implications for the IMF industry, globally and within China. This study is the first to document parents' preferences toward IMF since the outbreak. We used novel methods to do so, through an online choice experiment of 804 participants that included risk perceptions and socio-demographic variables. Our study finds that Chinese parents continue to prioritize quality and safety attributes of IMF represented by functional ingredients, organic labelling and traceability information. Notably, it also finds greatly increased confidence in Chinese domestically produced IMF and an underlying preference away from expensive products. This implies that the era of 'go for foreign' and 'go for the most expensive' in IMF purchasing may be coming to an end. The shift in sentiment is driven by the longer-term revitalization of the Chinese dairy industry, accelerated by COVID-19. Understanding these trends will be of major benefit to both Chinese producers and non-Chinese exporters of IMF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据