4.7 Article

Evolution of the Crown Procyanidins' Tetramer during Winemaking and Aging of Red Wine

期刊

FOODS
卷 11, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11203194

关键词

crown procyanidins; condensed tannin; winemaking process; red wine aging; UPLC-UV-Q-TOF

资金

  1. French Ministry of Superior Education and Research (MESRI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Condensed tannins, particularly crown procyanidins, have been identified as playing a crucial role in the quality of red wine. Their unique macrocyclic structure and strong resistance to oxidation make them stand out in the winemaking process. During aging, crown procyanidins remain stable while non-cyclic tannins decrease significantly, showcasing their unique characteristics in the wine.
Condensed tannins play a major role in the quality of red wine. After grape extraction, they quickly evolve thanks to different oxidation mechanisms. Recently, NMR identified a new sub class of condensed tannins, named crown procyanidins, in red wine. The crown procyanidins' tetramer exhibits a macrocyclic structure composed of four (-)-epicatechin with an unusual cavity in the center of the molecule. These new tannins exposed a higher polarity than the linear tannins. In this work, the evolution kinetics of these crown procyanidins during the winemaking process and after aging of red wine in bottles were studied. Samples' quantification was analyzed by UPLC-UV-Q-TOF. The concentration of cyclic and non-cyclic procyanidins was compared. During the winemaking process, crown procyanidins are mainly extracted at the beginning of the alcoholic fermentation and they remain stable until the end of the winemaking process. The high polarity and solubility of this new molecule in water was confirmed. During the aging of red wine in bottles, crown procyanidins' concentrations are stable, whereas the non-cyclic tannins decrease dramatically. Finally, a strong oxygenation experiment confirmed the crown procyanidins' resistance to oxidation and unique skills.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据