4.7 Article

Structural, Thermal and Pasting Properties of Heat-Treated Lotus Seed Starch-Protein Mixtures

期刊

FOODS
卷 11, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11192933

关键词

lotus seed starch; lotus seed protein; starch-protein mixture; structural properties; thermal properties

资金

  1. Fujian Provincial Department of Human Resources and Social Security [5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of interactions between lotus seed starch and protein on the quality of lotus seed processing by-products. The findings provide a practicable way to control the thermal and gelatinization properties of lotus seed starch-protein mixtures.
The interactions between starch and protein, the essential components of lotus seed, strongly influence the quality of lotus seed processing by-products. This study investigated the effects of lotus seed starch-protein (LS-LP) interactions on the structural, thermal and gelatinization properties of LS-LP mixtures, using LS/LP ratios of 6:1, 6:2, 6:3, 6:4, 6:5, or 1:1, after heat treatment (95 degrees C, 30 min). Fourier transform infrared peaks at 1540 cm(-1) and 3000-3600 cm(-1) revealed the major interactions (electrostatic and hydrogen bonding) between LS and LP. The UV-visible absorption intensities (200-240 nm) of LS-LP mixtures increased with increased protein content. X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy revealed that LS-LP consists of crystalline starch granules encapsulated by protein aggregates. Increasing the addition of protein to the mixtures restricted the swelling of the starch granules, based on their solubility, swelling properties and thermal properties. Viscometric analysis indicated that the formation of LS-LP mixtures improved structural and storage stability. These findings provide a practicable way to control the thermal and gelatinization properties of lotus seed starch-protein mixtures, by changing the proportions of the two components, and provide a theoretical basis for developing novel and functional lotus-seed-based foods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据