4.7 Article

Exposure to whale watching vessels affects dive ascents and resting behavior in sperm whales

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.914397

关键词

Physeter macrocephalus; disturbance; whale watching; foraging and diving effort; locomotion effort; resting and socializing

资金

  1. Portuguese Science & Technology Foundation (FCT)
  2. Azorean Science & Technology Fund (FRCT)
  3. EC [Acores-01-0145-FEDER-000057]
  4. FCTExploratory [IF/00943/2013/CP1199/CT0001]
  5. META [FA_06_2017_017]
  6. FEDER
  7. COMPETE
  8. QREN
  9. POPH
  10. ESF
  11. PO AZORES 2020
  12. Portuguese Ministry for Science and Education
  13. WATCH IT [Acores-01-0145-FEDER-000057]
  14. SRMCT/DRAM under project RAGES [GA 110661/2018/794607/SUB/ENV.C.2]
  15. INTERTAGUA [MAC2/1.1a/385]
  16. University of St. Andrews under project ACCURATE [ONR-ID314_02-142019_0852-30]
  17. FCT-IP Project [UIDP/05634/2020]
  18. FCT [SFRH/BPD/108007/2015, UIDB/05634/2020]
  19. RANNIS Icelandic Research Fund [207081]
  20. PO AZORES 2020 MarAZ Researchers: Consolidate a body of researchers in Marine Sciences in the Azores of the EU [01-0145-FEDER-000140]
  21. Regional Government of the Azores [M1.1.A/REEQ.CIENT'IFICO UID/2021/010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used high-resolution multi-sensor tags to evaluate the short-term behavioral responses of sperm whales to whale watching vessels. The researchers found no significant changes in foraging behavior and overall dive behavior between exposure and non-exposure periods. However, there was an increase in body pitch variation during non-foraging periods. Additionally, sperm whales showed higher vertical velocity during ascents in response to vessel exposure. These findings highlight the potential impact of whale watching disturbance on the energetic balance and fitness of cetaceans.
Disturbance from whale watching can induce a wide range of behavioral responses in cetaceans, some of which can affect their energetic balance and, ultimately, their long-term fitness. However, assessing disturbance effects on deep-diving cetaceans remains challenging, as the majority of their activities occurs underwater and are difficult to monitor from surface observations. To surpass this limitation, we attached high-resolution multi-sensor tags (DTAGs) on 24 sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) off the Azores, an area of intense whale watching, to evaluate changes in movement and acoustic parameters related to foraging effort and dives, locomotion effort, and non-foraging behavior. These parameters were compared between periods of exposure and non-exposure to whale watching vessels, using linear mixed-effect models to assess the presence of short-term effects, accounting for individual differences in behavior. We found no significant changes in foraging effort (number of buzzes, bottom phase depth, proportion of search and foraging phases) and overall dive behavior (dive duration, proportion of dive phases, and descending or ascending pitch) between non-exposure and exposure periods. In contrast, variation in body pitch during non-foraging periods increased during exposure but not variation in body roll. Taken together, these results suggest increased movements during resting activity, which may carry energetic costs to whales and impact their health. Vertical velocity during ascents was also significantly higher in response to vessel exposure, suggesting that sperm whales increased the frequency of fluke strokes, which was consistent with a higher Overall Dynamic Body Acceleration (ODBA) during ascents, incurring in higher energy expenditure. If the detected changes are repeated across multiple exposures, they might affect the individual's energetic budget, and consequently their fitness. Our study contributes to a better understanding of the short-term behavioral responses of sperm whales to whale watching vessels and highlights the need for further studies examining the potential consequences from repeated disturbance to individuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据