4.6 Article

ANCA-associated vasculitis following Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil: Is there a causal relationship? A case report

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1003332

关键词

acute kidney injury; COVID-19; vaccine; Oxford; AstraZeneca

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a case of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis following the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in a 58-year-old female patient. The patient experienced symptoms such as fatigue, anemia, and abnormal urine after vaccination, and her kidney function deteriorated. With appropriate treatment, the patient's condition is currently stable.
This article presents a case of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis following the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in a female patient 58 years old. After 5 days, she presented fatigue, paleness, arthralgia on hands, knees, ankles, foamy urine, and elevated blood pressure. Exams showed serum creatinine of 2.2 mg/dL (baseline creatinine of 1.0 mg/dL). Urinalysis revealed hematuria, and her 24-h urinary protein excretion was 4.4 g. Additional exams showed hypercholesterolemia, severe anemia, and normal serum albumin. Testing of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies anti-myeloperoxidase was positive at a titer of 1/80. Serum and urine protein electrophoresis and other exams showed no alterations. She was started on steroid pulse therapy after worsening kidney function, reaching serum creatinine of 3.3 mg/dL. A kidney biopsy revealed crescentic glomerulonephritis with glomerular sclerosis, fibrous crescents, interstitial fibrosis, and tubular atrophy. Induction therapy was given with intravenous cyclophosphamide 0.5 g/m(2) for 6-monthly pulses, followed by maintenance therapy with oral azathioprine at 2 mg/kg and prednisone tapering. The patient did not develop any complications during the induction therapy, and is currently on maintenance therapy with a serum creatinine of 1.87 mg/dL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据