4.6 Review

Non-pharmacological treatment in difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.991677

关键词

difficult-to-treat; rheumatoid arthritis; non-pharmacological; treatment; exercise; psychotherapy; physiotherapy

资金

  1. National Scientific Research Program [OTKA K-131479]
  2. Rheuma Tolerance for Cure [H2020 777357]
  3. Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary from the National Research, Development, and Innovation Fund [TKP2021-EGA/TKP2021-NVA/ TKP2021-NKTA]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although significant progress has been made in the pharmacological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a considerable number of patients still do not achieve treatment goals. Non-pharmacological treatments (NPTs) play a crucial role, especially in difficult-to-treat RA (D2TRA), where pharmacological options are often limited. NPTs seem to have a complex, holistic effect that can complement targeted pharmacotherapies in the treatment of D2TRA.
Although the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has improved remarkably with new pharmacological therapies, there is still a significant part of patients not reaching treatment goals. Difficult-to-treat RA (D2TRA) is a complex entity involving several factors apart from persistent inflammation, thereafter requiring a holistic management approach. As pharmacological treatment options are often limited in D2TRA, the need for non-pharmacological treatments (NPT) is even more pronounced. The mechanism of action of non-pharmacological treatments is not well investigated, NPTs seem to have a complex, holistic effect including the immune, neural and endocrine system, which can have a significant additive benefit together with targeted pharmacotherapies in the treatment of D2TRA. In this review we summarize the current knowledge on different NPT in rheumatoid arthritis, and we propose a NPT plan to follow when managing D2TRA patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据