4.6 Article

Dental pulp stem cells retain mesenchymal phenotype despite differentiation toward retinal neuronal fate in vitro

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.821361

关键词

dental pulp stem cells; mesenchymal stem cells; retinal ganglion cells; retinal differentiation; retinal stem cell therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) derived from the neural crest are easily accessible MSCs that have potential for retinal therapy. This study shows that DPSCs maintain their mesenchymal phenotype and upregulate retinal markers under differentiation conditions. However, current markers are inadequate for isolating neural crest cells in DPSCs, highlighting the need for more specific markers.
Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) are an easily accessible, heterogenous source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that are derived from the neural crest. Evidence suggests that they have neurotrophic qualities in their undifferentiated state and can also be differentiated into neuronal and retinal cell types. There is growing interest in using DPSCs in cell-based therapies to treat glaucoma and blinding retinal diseases. However, careful characterization of these cells is necessary as direct intravitreal and subretinal MSC transplantation is known to lead to deleterious glial reaction and fibrosis. In this study, we provide evidence for the mesenchymal-predominant nature of DPSCs and show that DPSCs maintain their mesenchymal phenotype despite upregulating mature retinal markers under retinal differentiation conditions. CD56, which was previously thought to be a specific marker of neural crest lineage, is robustly co-expressed with mesenchymal markers and may not be adequate for isolating a subpopulation of neural crest cells in DPSCs. Therefore, identification of more specific markers is required to elucidate the heterogeneity of the population and to successfully isolate a putative neural stem cell population before DPSCs can be used for retinal therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据