4.6 Article

Simple new technique for macular pucker peel without forceps

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.947578

关键词

epiretinal membrane; macular pucker peel; pars plana vitrectomy; best corrected visual acuity; central retinal thickness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes a new technique for surgery of macular pucker using a 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy cutter without forceps. The results show that this technique is effective in achieving anatomical and functional improvement in patients, with no intra- or post-operative complications.
PurposeThis study aimed to describe the effectiveness and evaluate the anatomical and functional results of surgery for macular pucker (MP) peel using a 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) cutter without forceps. MethodsThis study assessed a prospective consecutive case series of 14 eyes of 14 patients who underwent 25-gauge PPV for MP. The surgical procedure was performed using the new peeling technique. The edge of the membrane was engaged at the opening of the cutter by gradually increasing the vacuum. The peeling process was finished by holding a stable vacuum or regrasping the membrane in the same manner. ResultsThe study included six women and eight men patients with a mean age of 72.3 (range 59-84) years. MP peel was achieved in all cases without the need for microforceps. Patients were followed for at least 6 months. Visual acuity and retinal thickness were obtained 6 months after the surgery. Best corrected visual acuity improved from a mean pre-operative 0.6 on a logMAR scale to post-operative 0.23 (P < 0.001). Mean pre-operative Central Retinal Thickness was significantly reduced from 489.7 to 377.6 mu m post-operatively (P < 0.001). There were no intra- or post-operative complications. ConclusionMP peel with a 25-gauge vitrectomy probe could be an alternative simple and safe technique. The technique does not require extra instrumentation. It results in anatomic and functional improvement in all cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据