4.7 Article

Effect of UV/ClO2 pretreatment on controlling ultrafiltration membrane fouling of different natural organic matter (NOM) fractions

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103156

关键词

Ultrafiltration; UV; ClO2; Membrane fouling; NOM; Water purification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. [52000062]
  3. [52200015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that UV/ClO2 pretreatment can effectively alleviate ultrafiltration membrane fouling, improve membrane hydrophilicity and interfacial free energy. It can also remove organic pollutants and fluorescent components, but may lead to the deterioration of dissolved organic carbon in the permeate.
The ultrafiltration membrane fouling caused by natural organic matter (NOM) is a prevalent problem. In this research, UV/ClO2 pretreatment was employed to control ultrafiltration (UF) membrane fouling induced by various components of NOM. Three typical organic model foulants, including humic acid (HA), sodium alginate (NaAlg) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were used as representative organic components in natural waters, and their mixture was employed as simulated NOM water. The results showed that UV/ClO2 pretreatment was effective in alleviating membrane fouling induced by HA, NaAlg, BSA, and NOM, which was demonstrated by the enhanced hydrophilicity and interfacial free energy after UV/ClO2 pretreatment. Besides, it showed remarkable removal performance of UV254 and fluorescent components, but caused a deterioration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the permeate, which was attributed to the oxidation of unsaturated organic compounds and reductive organic molecular weight (MW). Moreover, the significantly degradation of disinfection byproduct precursors (DBPs) and micro-polluted organic matter of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) were confirmed. With UV/ClO2 pretreatment, the dominant fouling mechanism in the initial stage of HA and NaAlg showed a tendency that pore blocking played a dominated role, which was opposite with BSA and NOM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据