4.6 Article

Metabolic Phenotyping Study of Mouse Brain Following Microbiome Disruption by C. difficile Colonization

期刊

METABOLITES
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo12111039

关键词

Clostridioides difficile; mice; antibiotics; FMT; metabolic profiling; metabolomics; LC-MS; GC-MS; brain

资金

  1. European Union (European Social Fund-ESF) [MIS-5033021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibiotic treatment and subsequent C. difficile infection have significant effects on brain metabolism, likely through gut dysbiosis and the gut-brain axis. None of the therapeutic approaches can fully restore the normal metabolic profile of the brain.
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is responsible for an increasing number of cases of post-antibiotic diarrhea worldwide, which has high severity and mortality among hospitalized elderly patients. The disruption of gut microbiota due to antibacterial medication facilitates the intestinal colonization of C. difficile. In the present study, a murine model was used to investigate the potential effects of antibiotic administration and subsequent colonization by C. difficile, as well as the effects of three different 10-day treatments (metronidazole, probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation), on the brain metabolome for the first time. Four different metabolomic-based methods (targeted HILIC-MS/MS, untargeted RP-LC-HRMS/MS, targeted GC-MS/MS, and untargeted GC-MS) were applied, resulting in the identification of 217 unique metabolites in the brain extracts, mainly glycerophos-pholipids, glycerolipids, amino acids, carbohydrates, and fatty acids. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis revealed that CDI, as well as the subsequent treatments, altered significantly several brain metabolites, probably due to gut dysbiosis, and affected the brain through the gut-brain axis. Notably, none of the therapeutic approaches completely restored the brain metabolic profile to the original, healthy, and non-infected phenotype, even after 10 days of treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据