4.7 Article

Net-metering and net-billing in photovoltaic self-consumption: The cases of Ecuador and Spain

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102434

关键词

Solar photovoltaics; Photovoltaic self-consumption; Net-metering; Net-billing

资金

  1. Universidad Nacional de Loja, Ecuador [34-DIFEIRNNR-2021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research aims to improve the regulations in Ecuador and other countries by learning from the experience in Spain and promoting the development of self-consumption of photovoltaics. The economic analysis highlights the low profitability of small PV installations in Ecuador and the effectiveness of net-billing model in the medium and long term.
Solar Photovoltaics has become one of the cheapest sources of electricity, with the potential to expand further through distributed generation. PV self-consumption can empower electricity customers, transforming them into prosumers, but its success relies on appropriate regulations, especially in the treatment of surplus electricity, being net-metering and net-billing the most common remuneration mechanisms. As the number of such PV systems increases, regulation needs to evolve and may affect profitability. The purpose of this research is to take advantage of the Spanish experience, establishing key points that can improve the regulation in Ecuador and other countries. The operation of these remuneration schemes is studied through an economic analysis for a wide range of residential customers, highlighting the low profitability of small PV installations, which are not profitable for the average consumer in Ecuador. Grid parity is reached in Spain over 3 kW and in Ecuador only for the highest electricity consumers. Although the net-billing model is more effective in promoting PV self-consumption in the medium and long term, it requires additional conditions, such as those in Spain. Some recommendations are proposed, e.g. additional support with progressive tax reductions, simplication of permits and the introduction of collective self-consumption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据