4.7 Article

Experimental and parametric studies on the effect of waste cooking oil methyl ester with diesel fuel in compression ignition engine

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102705

关键词

Diesel engine; Full factorial; Waste cooking oil; Compression ratio; Emissions

资金

  1. King Khalid University [R.G.P. 2/129/43]
  2. Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology Bhopal, India
  3. Rajeev Gandhi Memorial College of Engineering and Technology Nandyal, National Institute of Technology Manipur, Bansal Institute of Science and Technology, Bhopal, M.P, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that mixing waste cooking oil biodiesel with diesel fuel can reduce carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon emissions, but it increases nitrogen oxide emissions.
Diesel engine discharge characteristics are primarily influenced by fuel qualities, combustion chamber type, and injection settings. This study used combinations of biodiesel, waste cooking oil, and diesel fuel to do a parametric investigation on a diesel engine (DF80-WCOB20, DF70-WCOB30, DF60-WCOB40, and DF50-WCOB50). Using a complete factorial design L75 orthogonal array (O.A.), the experimental and parametric investigations were carried out. According to the experimental findings, DF80-WCOB20, DF70-WCOB30, DF60-WCOB40, and DF50-WCOB50 increase specific energy consumption while reducing engine efficiency, carbon monoxide emissions, and hydrocarbon discharges. At all engine loads, DF80-WCOB20's brake thermal efficiency (BTE) was higher than that of DF70-WCOB30, DF60-WCOB40, and DF50-WCOB50 for respective compression ratios of 16.5, 17.5, and 18.5. Additionally, the BSFC for C.R. increases (16.5, 17.5, and 18.5) at all engine loads when waste cooking oil biodiesel is mixed with diesel fuel compared to diesel fuel. The findings indicate that while adding biodiesel made from used cooking oil to diesel fuel greatly reduces carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon emissions, it also results in higher nitrogen oxide emissions than diesel fuel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据