4.6 Article

Global model of plasma-activated water over long time scale: Pulsed discharge and afterglow

期刊

HIGH VOLTAGE
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 326-339

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1049/hve2.12248

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the chemical properties of PAW produced by a dielectric barrier discharge driven by nanosecond voltage pulses, focusing on the production and consumption of reactive oxygen/nitrogen species. It also examines the effects of applied voltage and gap distance on RONS, showing that gaseous RONS are more sensitive to the gap distance while aqueous RONS are more sensitive to voltage amplitude. The results suggest the possibility of independently regulating gaseous and aqueous chemistry.
Plasma-activated water (PAW) has been utilised in various application fields, and a deep understanding on the plasma chemistry is the foundation of application-orientated optimisation. In this paper, a global model is built to study the chemical properties of PAW produced by a dielectric barrier discharge that is powered by nanosecond voltage pulses. The applied voltage is firstly repeated with 10 kHz frequency for 100 s, and then shut down for 200 s afterglow, providing a long-term evolution regarding the production and consumption of some typical reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (RONS) in PAW. The calculated results agree principally with experimental measurements from literature. During the pulsed discharge, the water gradually acidises, and the long-lived species accumulate; while in the afterglow, most of the aqueous RONS decay rapidly, except for O-3aq, NO3aq-, H2O2aq and N2Oaq, which might be the main sources to sustain long-term effects. Furthermore, the effects of applied voltage and gap distance on RONS are investigated. Correlation analyses from Pearson correlation coefficient indicate that gaseous RONS are more sensitive to the gap distance, while the aqueous ones are more sensitive to the voltage amplitude, suggesting the possibility to independently regulating the gaseous and aqueous chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据