4.7 Article

Silver-substituted cobalt zeolite imidazole framework on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets as a novel electrode for supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.105443

关键词

ZIF-67; Ag substitution; RGO composite; Large surface area; Supercapacitor; Porous material

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study incorporated silver, a highly conductive metal, into metal-organic frameworks to enhance the electrochemical performance of the composites. The results showed that the synthesized composite exhibited a bimetallic structure, high specific capacitance, low resistance, and promising cycling stability, making it suitable for energy storage applications.
Although metal-organic frameworks demonstrate enhanced surface area, incredible porosity, and a wellcontrolled structure, they exhibit low conductivity, limiting their use in energy storage devices. In this work, we incorporated different mass loadings of silver, the metal with the highest conductivity in the zeolitic imidazolate framework-67 (ZIF-67) to enhance the electrochemical performance of their composites. The synthesized composites were extensively characterized using various techniques, and the electrochemical characterization of the constructed electrodes in 6 M KOH was performed using a two-electrode Swagelok cell. The results showed that the composite (ZIF-67.Agx=10/RGO) formed an efficient bimetallic structure and performs optimally with a specific capacitance (Cs) of 375 F/g at 5 mV s-1 and the smallest equivalent series resistance. The electrode material exhibited promising cycling stability over 2000 cycles reaching 97 % at 2 A g-1. Moreover, its energy density reached 46.388 Wh/kg along with a power density of 199.7 W/kg. Furthermore, it possessed the maximum specific surface area with all fabricated active material composite electrodes, reaching 1105 m2/g. The proposed composite can be used in energy storage applications and the conductivity will be further enhanced by co-doping.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据