4.7 Article

A molten salt route to binder-free CeO2 on carbon cloth for high performance supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.105451

关键词

Cerium oxide; Molten salt; Supercapacitor; Oxygen vacancy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52072338, 51862005]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY20E020013]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang [GK219909299001-010]
  4. Shanxi-Zheda Institute of Advanced Materials and Chemical Engineering [2021SZ- TD006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports a method to synthesize CeO2 nanoparticles abundant in surface oxygen vacancies using a one-step molten salt method, and grows them directly on a carbon cloth as electrode material. The CeO2@CC exhibits a high specific capacitance and good capacitance retention, indicating that CeO2 could be a candidate material for high-performance supercapacitors.
Cerium oxide is one of the most abundant and environment-benignity rare earth oxides, which is thus of interesting to explore its feasibility to serve as a safe and efficient candidate for supercapacitor electrodes. We report herein a facile one-step molten salt method to synthesize CeO2 nanoparticles abundant in surface oxygen vacancies, which are directly grown on a carbon cloth (CeO2@CC). The CeO2@CC exhibits a high specific capacitance of 811.5 mF cm(-2) at the current density of 5 mA cm(-2) in -0.8-0 V, with a good capacitance retention of 86.3 % at 5 mA cm(-2) after 10,000 cycles in 6 M KOH aqueous electrolyte. When assembled with a Co3O4@CC positive electrode, the Co3O4@CC//CeO2@CC asymmetric supercapacitor achieves an energy density of 0.11 mWh cm(-2 )at a power density of 3.25 mW cm(-2). Both the abundant oxygen vacancies and the conductive carbon cloth contribute to the electrochemical performance. This work suggests that CeO2 could be a candidate material for high performance supercapacitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据