4.6 Article

A system suitability testing platform for untargeted, high-resolution mass spectrometry

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.1026184

关键词

metabolomics; quality assurance; quality control; mass spectrometry; analytical chemistry

资金

  1. Strategic Focal Area Personalized Health and Related Technologies (PHRT)
  2. ETH Zurich

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The broad coverage of untargeted metabolomics poses challenges for measurement harmonization over time. To address this, researchers propose a system suitability testing platform for time-of-flight mass spectrometers. The platform can verify instrument performance before sample injection and offers various applications.
The broad coverage of untargeted metabolomics poses fundamental challenges for the harmonization of measurements along time, even if they originate from the very same instrument. Internal isotopic standards can hardly cover the chemical complexity of study samples. Therefore, they are insufficient for normalizing data a posteriori as done for targeted metabolomics. Instead, it is crucial to verify instrument's performance a priori, that is, before samples are injected. Here, we propose a system suitability testing platform for time-offlight mass spectrometers independent of liquid chromatography. It includes a chemically defined quality control mixture, a fast acquisition method, software for extracting ca. 3,000 numerical features from profile data, and a simple web service for monitoring. We ran a pilot for 21 months and present illustrative results for anomaly detection or learning causal relationships between the spectral features and machine settings. Beyond mere detection of anomalies, our results highlight several future applications such as 1) recommending instrument retuning strategies to achieve desired values of quality indicators, 2) driving preventive maintenance, and 3) using the obtained, detailed spectral features for posterior data harmonization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据