4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Solar air heater with rotating circular ribs: Hybrid CFD-ANN approach for prediction of thermo-hydraulic performance

期刊

ENERGY REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 145-150

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.084

关键词

SAH; Artificial neural network; Computational fluid dynamics; Artificial roughness; AI; Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hybrid CFD-ANN approach is used to predict the thermo-hydraulic performance of a solar air heater with rotating circular ribs. An optimized ANN model is developed based on CFD simulations, and it shows good agreement with experimental results. The optimized ANN model significantly reduces the computational time compared to CFD simulations.
A hybrid computational fluid dynamics-artificial neural network approach is implemented to predict the thermo-hydraulic performance factor of a solar air heater with rotating circular ribs. Effects of rib height, rib pitch, and rib rotating speed are investigated for Reynolds numbers ranging from 3800 to 18000. A total of 432 different cases are simulated using CFD. Based on these data sets, an optimized ANN model is developed to predict thermo-hydraulic performance. The optimized ANN model has an architecture of 4-17-17-1 and it has a mean squared error of 3.89 x 10(-6) for the testing data sets. The maximum thermo-hydraulic performance achieved is 1.57 for rib height of 1 4 mm, rib pitch of 25 mm, rib rotating speed of 10000 rpm at Reynolds number = 3800. The generalization capacity of the optimized ANN model is tested using experimental results and it is found that ANN predictions are in agreement with CFD simulation results. A comparison of computational time is also performed and approximately 100% reduction in computational time is achieved using the optimized artificial neural network model. This research establishes that ANN can be an excellent design tool for assessing the performance of novel solar air heaters. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据