4.6 Article

Graphite-enhanced thermal properties of octadecylamine/graphite foam shape-stable composite phase change materials for thermal energy storage

期刊

ENERGY REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 13939-13947

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.121

关键词

Octadecylamine; Graphite foam; Heat storage; Latent heat

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Talents innovation and entrepreneurship project of Lanzhou city, China
  3. Outstanding Youth Fund of Gansu Province, China
  4. [52064036]
  5. [2021-RC-36]
  6. [22JR5RA220]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, octadecylamine/graphite foam composite phase change materials (ODA/GF CPCMs) with excellent thermal properties and stability were prepared by vacuum impregnation, making them suitable for energy storage applications.
In this study, octadecylamine/graphite foam composite phase change materials (ODA/GF CPCMs) were prepared by vacuum impregnation; octadecylamine (ODA) was used as the phase change materials (PCMs), and graphite foam (GF) was used as the support material. Polyurethane (PU) foam obtained after hydrolysis in 40 wt% NaOH solution at 80 degrees C for 30 min was the template for the GF; therefore, the prepared GF has many interpenetrating pore structures, providing many adsorption sites for PCMs. For the ODA/GF-3 CPCMs with 15 wt% graphite addition, the loading of ODA is as high as 92.3%, the thermal stability is excellent, the melting temperature is 52.1 degrees C, and the latent heat of fusion is 218. 1 J/g, which is 1.1 times that of pure ODA. The thermal conductivity of ODA/GF-3 CPCMs is 0.725 W/m center dot K, which is 2.2 times that of pure ODA. These results indicate that ODA/GF CPCMs have good thermal properties, and their competitiveness in the field of energy storage is greatly improved due to their excellent performance.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据