4.6 Article

Optimization and dynamic responses of an integrated fuel cell and battery system for an 800 kW ferry: A case study

期刊

ENERGY REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 9757-9776

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.144

关键词

Proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC); Li-Ion battery; Dynamic response; Power generation; Optimization

资金

  1. European Union [754354]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the possibility of using an integrated Lithium-Ion battery and proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) as the prime mover. Twenty-five scenarios are proposed, and the results show that the best performance can be achieved with a Lithium Titanite Oxide (LTO) Lithium-Ion battery and nine PEMFCs.
The recent targets by different countries to stop the sales or registrations of internal combustion engines (ICE) have led to the further development of battery and fuel cell technologies to provide power for different applications. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the possibility of using an integrated Lithium-Ion battery and proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) as the prime mover for a case study of a 800 kW ferry with a total length of 50.8 m to transport 780 passengers for a distance of 24 km in 70 min. Accounting for five types of Lithium-Ion batteries and different numbers of PEMFCs, twenty-five scenarios are suggested based on a quasi-static model. To perform the optimization, the Performance Criterion of the Fuel cell-Battery integrated systems (PCFB) is introduced to include the effects of the sizes, weights, costs, hydrogen consumption, efficiency, and power in addition to the number of fuel cells and the battery capacity. Results indicate that the maximum PCFB value of 10.755 (1/kg(2)m(3)$) can be obtained once the overall size, weight, efficiency, hydrogen consumption, and cost of the system are 18 m(3), 11160 kg, 49.25%, 33.6 kg, and 119.58 k$, respectively, using the Lithium Titanite Oxide (LTO) Lithium-Ion battery with nine PEMFCs. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据