4.6 Review

Improving enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass by bio-coordinated physicochemical pretreatment-A review

期刊

ENERGY REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 696-709

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.12.015

关键词

Lignocellulosic biomass; Combined pretreatment; Biological pretreatment; Enzymatic hydrolysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lignocellulosic biomass is a promising renewable energy source, and biological pretreatment methods have advantages in improving enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency. However, the time-consuming and low efficiency of biological pretreatment still limit its large-scale application.
The abundant lignocellulosic biomass has great potential as a renewable energy source. Due to its resistant nature, lignocellulosic biomass requires pretreatment to increase its accessibility to cellulase. Currently, the main types of pretreatments include physical, chemical, and biological pretreatment, of which biological pretreatment is favored for its advantages of mild conditions, nonpolluting, and low energy consumption. Still, disadvantages such as time-consuming and low efficiency limit its large-scale application. This review focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of various pretreatment methods, highlighting the advances in research on bio-coordinated physicochemical pretreatment to improve the enzymatic hydrolysis rate of lignocellulosic biomass. By bio-coordinating different pretreatment methods, biological pretreatment time has been shortened, and enzymatic sugar yield has been increased by more than 30% in general compared with pretreatment alone, which has a broad application prospect in industrial production. However, research gaps related to the economic-technical analysis and combined pretreatment energy efficiency still remain. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Superscript/Subscript Available

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据