4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Experimental study on preparation and thermal storage properties of expanded graphite/paraffin wax as a shape-stabilized phase change material

期刊

ENERGY REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 324-331

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.09.149

关键词

Paraffin wax; Expanded graphite; Shape-stabilized phase change materials; Packed bed heat storage tank; Thermal properties

资金

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, China [18020501000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the application of a shape-stabilized phase change material (SSPCM) made by mixing paraffin wax with expanded graphite in heat storage systems. The SSPCM demonstrated high thermal conductivity and suitable density, resulting in a thermal efficiency of 95.3% for the heat storage system.
As an organic phase change material (PCM), paraffin wax (PW) has the problem of low thermal conductivity. It has been applied in the heat storage engineering. To improve the thermal performance of paraffin wax adopted in heat storage, it was mixed with expanded graphite (EG) via melt-blending method. The EG/PW was compressed into a shape-stabilized phase change material (SSPCM). The DSC curve was measured and the relationship between pressure and density of the SSPCM was tested. The SSPCM was vacuum encapsulated in aluminum bags and placed in a packed bed heat storage system to measure the thermal storage properties. The results showed that the thermal conductivity of the SSPCM was 7.06 W/(m degrees C), and the maximum density of the SSPCM was 1.07 g/cm(3). The average thermal efficiency of the heat storage system was 95.3%. The number of heat storage units was positively correlated with the heat release power. This study explored the feasibility of a simplified heat storage system. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Energy Storage Technology and Power Systems, ESPS, 2022.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据