4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Multi-type electric vehicle load prediction based on Monte Carlo simulation

期刊

ENERGY REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 966-972

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.264

关键词

Multi-type electric vehicle; Load prediction; GM (1, 1) prediction model; Monte Carlo simulation; Charging characteristics

资金

  1. Science and Technology Project of State Grid Corporation of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an electric vehicle (EV) charging load prediction approach that considers vehicle types. It utilizes the GM (1,1) model to estimate EV ownership and employs the Monte Carlo algorithm to build a probability distribution model for travel laws and charging characteristics. The analysis of charging behavior for different types of EVs allows for the comparison of load demand with the original load curve, providing theoretical guidance for grid planning and optimal dispatching.
In the paper, an electric vehicle (EV) charging load prediction approach considering vehicle types is developed. The GM (1,1) model is initially introduced to estimate the ownership of electric vehicles (EVs), and the model is validated by examining the difference between the forecast results and the actual situation. The Monte Carlo algorithm is also used to build the probability distribution model of travel laws and charging characteristics to predict the load demand when the scale of EVs is connected to the grid. For various types of EVs, the charging behavior is analyzed by considering charging start moment, charging duration, the initial state of charge (SOC), daily mileage, and charging mode. The charging load curves for each type of EV are superimposed to obtain the total load demand curve. Then it is compared with the original load curve in a certain region to analyze the impact of EV charging load on the original load curve of the grid, and to provide theoretical guidance for grid planning and optimal dispatching. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据