4.6 Article

Co-Fermentations of Kveik with Non-Conventional Yeasts for Targeted Aroma Modulation

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10101922

关键词

Kveik; brewing; volatile aroma compound; maltotriose; Saccharomyces; Hanseniaspora

资金

  1. Wissenschaftsforderung der Deutschen Brauwirtschaft e.V. [B113]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kveik isolates were found to be suitable for co-fermentations with certain non-conventional yeasts (NCY) to enhance beer or spirit fermentations, increasing the potential of these yeasts for beverage productions.
Kveik are consortia of yeast used for farmhouse ale production in Western Norway. Yeast strains derived from these mixtures are known, for example, for their high fermentation rate, thermotolerance, lack of phenolic off flavor production (POF-) and strong flocculation phenotype. In this study, we used five single cell yeast isolates from different Kveik yeasts, analyzed their fermentation and flavor production, and compared it with a typical yeast used in distilleries using 20 degrees C and 28 degrees C as the fermentation temperatures. One of the isolates, Kveik No 3, showed an impairment of maltotriose utilization and thus a reduced ethanol yield. Kveik fermentations for spirit production often harbor bacteria for flavor enrichment. We sought to improve Kveik fermentations with non-conventional yeasts (NCY). To this end we co-fermented Kveik isolates with Hanseniaspora uvarum, Meyerozyma guilliermondii and Pichia kudriavzevii using 5:1 ratios (Kveik vs. NCY) at 20 degrees C. The combinations of Kveik No 1 with P. kudriavzevii and Kveik No 1 with Hanseniaspora uvarum showed substantially increased amounts of specific volatile aroma compounds that were previously identified in the NCYs. Our results indicate that Kveik isolates appear to be suitable for co-fermentations with certain NCY to enhance beer or spirit fermentations, increasing the potential of these yeasts for beverage productions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据