4.7 Article

Improving Precise Genome Editing Using Donor DNA/gRNA Hybrid Duplex Generated by Complementary Bases

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom12111621

关键词

CRISPR/Cas9; genome editing; single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide; guide RNA; DNA/RNA hybrid; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [JP21lm0203013]
  2. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) Moonshot RD [22101502-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully increased the efficiency of precise genome editing by creating a donor DNA/guide RNA hybrid duplex. Compared to editing with separately introduced gRNA and donor DNA, the HDR-mediated editing efficiency using this hybrid duplex technique was improved by 1.8-fold.
In precise genome editing, site-specific DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) induced by the CRISPR/Cas9 system are repaired via homology-directed repair (HDR) using exogenous donor DNA templates. However, the low efficiency of HDR-mediated genome editing is a barrier to widespread use. In this study, we created a donor DNA/guide RNA (gRNA) hybrid duplex (DGybrid) that was composed of sequence-extended gRNA and single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide (ssODN) combined with complementary bases without chemical modifications to increase the concentration of donor DNA at the cleavage site. The efficiency of genome editing using DGybrid was evaluated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The results show a 1.8-fold (from 35% to 62%) improvement in HDR-mediated editing efficiency compared to genome editing in which gRNA and donor DNA were introduced separately. In addition, analysis of the nucleic acid introduction efficiency using flow cytometry indicated that both RNA and ssODNs are efficiently incorporated into cells together by using the DNA/RNA hybrid. Our technique would be preferred as a universal and concise tool for improving the efficiency of HDR-mediated genome editing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据