4.7 Review

Pancreatic Cancer Research beyond DNA Mutations

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom12101503

关键词

pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; sequencing; mutations; RNA; cancer metabolism

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [19K22658, 20H00541, 22H03146, 22K19559]
  2. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [17cm0106414h0002, JP19lm0203007, JP20lm0203007, JP21lm0203007]
  3. Mitsubishi Foundation
  4. Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article describes the causes and complexity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis and the multifaceted characteristics of PDAC in terms of cancer cell metabolism, mesenchymal cells, and metagenomics. The article also mentions various pathway alterations associated with PDAC treatment refractoriness and prospects for the application of new technologies.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is caused by genetic mutations in four genes: KRAS proto-oncogene and GTPase (KRAS), tumor protein P53 (TP53), cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), and mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 (SMAD4), also called the big 4. The changes in tumors are very complex, making their characterization in the early stages challenging. Therefore, the development of innovative therapeutic approaches is desirable. The key to overcoming PDAC is diagnosing it in the early stages. Therefore, recent studies have investigated the multifaced characteristics of PDAC, which includes cancer cell metabolism, mesenchymal cells including cancer-associated fibroblasts and immune cells, and metagenomics, which extend to characterize various biomolecules including RNAs and volatile organic compounds. Various alterations in the KRAS-dependent as well as KRAS-independent pathways are involved in the refractoriness of PDAC. The optimal combination of these new technologies is expected to help treat intractable pancreatic cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据