4.7 Article

New Statement about NRF2 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Dementia

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom12091200

关键词

ALS; FTD; FTLD; NRF2; neurodegeneration; NQO1; HO-1

资金

  1. Comunidad de Madrid [B2017/BMD-3813]
  2. MINECO [PID2019-105600RB-I00]
  3. ISCiiiCIBERNED [CB18/05/00040, CB06/05/0089]
  4. Fundela [2019/00325/001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides evidence that the NRF2 signaling pathway is differently affected in ALS and FTD, suggesting a distinct regulatory mechanism for cellular homeostasis in these neurodegenerative disorders.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are related neurodegenerative disorders displaying substantial overlay, although there are substantial differences at the molecular level. Currently, there is no effective treatment for these diseases. The transcription factor NRF2 has been postulated as a promising therapeutic target as it is capable of modulating key pathogenic events affecting cellular homeostasis. However, there is little experimental evidence on the status of this pathway in both ALS and FTD. Therefore, in this work, we wanted to carry out an exhaustive analysis of this signaling pathway in both transgenic mouse models (ALS and FTD) and human samples from patients with sporadic ALS (sALS) versus controls. In samples from patients with sALS and in the transgenic model with overexpression of TDP-43(A315T), we observed a significant increase in the NRF2/ARE pathway in the motor cortex and the spinal cord, indicating that NRF2 antioxidant signaling was being induced, but it was not enough to reach cellular homeostasis. On the other hand, in the transgenic FTD model with overexpression of the TDP-43(WT) protein in forebrain neurons, a significantly decreased expression of NQO1 in the prefrontal cortex was seen, which cannot be attributed to alterations in the NRF2 pathway. Our results show that NRF2 signature is differently affected for ALS and FTD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据